Ba24 Elizabeth Bakepuiz

    Elizabeth Bakepuiz (1212 - ), daughter of John de Bakepuiz Ba25 (1184 - ) and Roesia of Barton, Bakepuiz, Derbyshire, and granddaughter of Robert Bakepuiz (Ba26)(1110 - ) and ? Grimbald and great granddaughter of Ralph Bakepuiz (Ba27)
    Born: 1212  
    Married: 1242 Sir William Gresley Gr24) (1206 - 1254), the son of Geoffrey Gresley and Margaret Sommerville
    Died: 
    T
    and had issue: 
    G23 Geoffrey Gresley, Lord of Morton
     
     
     
    Source: http://www.smokykin.com/ged/f004/f46/a0044676.htm
    http://www.geocities.com/heartland/hills/6565/dat57.htm#18

    Roesia
    Birth : ABT. 1169 of, Derby, England
    Family:
    Marriage: ABT. 1196 in of, Barton Bakepuiz, Derby, England
    Spouse:
    John de Bakepuiz (Ba25), 
    Birth : ABT. 1184 of, Barton Bakepuiz, Derby, England
    Parents:
    Father: Bakepuiz, Robert (Ba26)
    Mother: Grimbald, Miss

    Children:
    (Ba24-1)William de Bakepuiz, 
    (Ba24) Elizabeth de Bakepuiz,
    (Ba24-3) John  de Bakepuiz,

    Grimbald, Miss
    Birth : ABT. 1120 of, Leicester, England
    Family:
    Marriage: ABT. 1148 in of, Allexton, Leicester, England
    Spouse:
    (Ba26) Bakepuiz, Robert
    Birth : ABT. 1110 of, Allexton, Leicester, England

    Children:
    Bakepuiz, Aeliza or Alice
    Birth : ABT. 1150 of, Burton Bakepuiz, Derby, England
    (Ba25-1) Bakepuiz, Robert
    Birth : ABT. 1156 of, Burton Bakepuiz, Derby, England
    (Ba25-2) Bakepuiz, Thomas
    Birth : ABT. 1160 of, Burton Bakepuiz, Derby, England
    (Ba25) Bakepuiz, John de

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Ralph de BAKEPUIZ (-1067) [Pedigree]
        b. of Bakepuiz, Normandy, France
        d. AFT 1067
    Children:
    Robert de BAKEPUIZ
    References: [WallopFH]
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Robert de BAKEPUIZ [Pedigree]
    Son of Ralph de BAKEPUIZ (-1067)
    Children:
    John de BAKEPUIZ Lord Barton Bakepuiz m. Roesia
    References: [WallopFH]
     

    Dat from: http://members.tripod.com/Angel_Princess1/surname.html
     Under the heading “Allexton” Nichols further states that in an
     Inquisition 48 Edward III, AD 1374-5, it was found that William Hackluit died
     45 Edward III, AD 1371-2, and that Sir John Mecum, Kt. (Meysham), aged 24, and
     John Trusell, aged 24, were his heirs to the Manor of Hackluit--escheat 47
     Edward III, Memb. 38.

     By another Inquisition of 50 Edward III, (AD 1376-7), it was found that
     William Hakeluit died, “seized” of a certain Manor, with its appurtenances in
     Allexton, which he held of Sir William Bakepuiz, Kt., in capite, by the
     service of 6d. or one pair of gilt spurs a year; and that John Meye of
     Lodington--presumably the Sir John Mecum, Kt., before mentioned--was the next
     heir in blood of the said William de Hakeluit, escheat 49 Edward III, Pars. 1,
     No. 66 Leicester.  Lodington is about twenty-eight miles south-east of
     Ashby-de-la-Zouche, Measham, and Castle Donington, and near to the border of
     the adjacent county of Rutland.  Nichols quotes the statement of the historian
     Burton, to the effect that at Hallaton there existed in the chancel-window,
     the arms; Argent, on a bend cottized gules, three mullets, for Hakluit; and
     that the same arms were displayed at Medbourne.  At Allexton, in AD 1592, Mr.
     Wyrley the antiquary found in the lowest north window, the arms; Gules two
     bars argent, in chief three horseshoes or; for John Bakepuiz, living in the
     time of Edward II,; and Gules, three pole axes or, for Hakeluit.  The family
     of Bakepuiz were patrons of Allexton from AD 1220 to AD 1385.  Henry Bakepuiz
     was Rector AD 1225-1274. previous to which it appears that Peter Bakepuiz was
     Rector , instituted by Hugh Wallys, who was consecrated Bishop of Lincoln 12th
     AD 1209, and died 8th February, AD 1234.  It should be borne in mind that
     Knight service, otherwise the obligation to assume Knighthood, and to serve
     the Sovereign in the field for a certain period when necessary, at the
     Knight’s personal expense, was compulsory with all those who held lands to the
     extent of a knight’s fee or fief.